During this war, clan rivalry became especially acute. The emergence of fighting clans, their prestige, and, especially, their control over territories led to the fact that the clans were ready to snatch victory from each other at great cost. But at what cost?
Some take advantage of organization and coherence, intra-clan work and strengthening of morale. And someone...
Today, members of the Elphius and Titan clans will be subject to our own investigation!
At the beginning of the war, the battle for leadership in the clan standings was fought between the Far Away Kingdom and the Horde. But then the Titans clan unexpectedly caught up and overtook everyone, and are now increasing their advantage. And Elfius is not far behind. What is the secret of their success? In coordinated work? But with equal numbers, it is extremely difficult to win back 10 million from the Horde and Far Away in a few days, and in the same Far Away and the Horde the organization is also not lame. Both Elfius and the Titans found a way out - to circumvent the rules established for bookmakers. Why fight on equal terms when these conditions can be improved for yourself!
The principle is simple - “mercenaries” are accepted. After 7 battles, on the same day, the “mercenaries” are immediately expelled and others are accepted, and so on. That is, while the size of the clan at any given time is still the same 250 people, up to 300 people can fight for the clan per day!
That is, the overlap over other clans is about 10-20%. (Titans for 2.5 last days- 27 “receptions and deductions”, and the elf has about 130!). And sometimes this advantage is enough to snatch victory for a sector at the flag, on each of which all clans throw their best forces!
I know people who did not sleep at night, sitting in the world or Skype, wasting energy on organizing in order to capture and hold sectors in an incredible struggle. And sometimes they lacked just a little!
Yes, in other clans there is also a process of expelling old clans and accepting new ones, but this is a work turnover, and not a planned, purposeful policy. And they try to take it on a permanent basis, for a long time - and not for one day.
And others simply throw away a lot of money, creating an advantage of a different kind! Why do you feel sorry for other people’s money? Are you jealous? - they will say in these clans. We have found a way that is not prohibited by anyone to achieve an advantage over others - and perhaps they will be right in their own way.
Perhaps this is not a violation at all in letter, but in spirit? Is this in keeping with the spirit of fair fight? We don’t know - and let readers express their opinions with their comments!
When fighting clans appeared, the administration clearly stated the condition - 250 people in a fighting clan. For what? Obviously - to create equal conditions for clans in the struggle for the palm, so that the most organized and friendly clan can win this struggle. That clan where each person could show their best qualities in the team.
But, apparently, many, having found a loophole, decided to take advantage of it. And many said - no, we want to fight honestly. And they didn’t force “pseudo-mercenaries” into the clan to achieve an advantage over others, which essentially shouldn’t exist!
Is this a violation? From the point of view fair play- undoubtedly! From the point of view of the laws of the GVD, this is debatable, since the regulations on fighting clans only contain a final limit on the size of a clan. And what principles of playing the game to adhere to is a matter for each clan and its head personally.
What do the members and heads of other fighting clans think about this problem? In your opinion, does the strategy of inviting a clan of “mercenaries” for a few hours have any right to life? I would like to emphasize once again that the editors expressed their opinion based on the ethics of the GVD world, and after talking with the heads and members of several clans. The editors do not pretend to be a judge or the ultimate truth, and certainly do not want to pass a guilty verdict!
Dear players - members and heads of other fighting clans, do not stand aside, speak out on the pages of our newspaper!
One of the members of the Elphius clan (Skilord) decided to express his opinion on the above. We also present the opinion of the Titans clan.
Skilord's opinion (Elphius).
In my response to the article “In war, all means are fair,” I would like to show arguments in opposition to what was said in it.
Let me say right away that I am for banning rotation, because this is not correct in principle. But…
I was confused by calling the victory of the clans that did the rotation dishonest. The rules of war were set by the administrators:
1. Limit of 250 people at a time.
2. 4500 - for accepting a new clan member.
3. 7 battles of one clan member.
4. Points are awarded for battles held under the sign of the clan!
Not a single rule was violated during the war, rotations were not prohibited. Some clans decided to take this opportunity to achieve their goals. After all, the end justifies the means. And this technique is no worse than the method of gathering people of 13+ lvl into a clan, for example.
Saying that rotation is a bug. A priori false. We are not having a battle of psychics, and we don’t know what the admins are up to. Yes, rotation is an oversight of this war, but to say that it is not fair is not correct. Everything was within the rules and assumptions.
I'll also add. Rotation was and is available to all clans. If you don’t like the method, then there is no need to talk about its dishonesty. That's the same as saying we don't like having crowds. high level, let's limit the number of highs in clans.
Titans clan opinion.
In the last few days, there have been a lot of admissions into the Titans clan and a lot of expulsions from the clan. I'll explain what this is connected with.
It's simple - people were excluded based on their activity and level, so that in their place they would be replaced by those who could bring more points to the clan. Regarding the “rotations,” there were 4 entries and exits of one’s own free will and initiative, the rest, excuse me, is far-fetched.
"In war, all means are good."
Based on the works of F.M. Dostoevsky "Crime and Punishment" and Vasil Bykov "Sotnikov".
Direction "Goals and means".
Often, when discussing the permissibility of any methods, people utter the phrase: “In war, all means are good.” But is it possible to say that?
The question immediately arises, what kind of war is meant? War in its usual understanding is an armed confrontation between states? But war can also be bloodless.
Our experts can check your essay using Unified State Exam criteria
Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
We know from history that there was a “cold war” - a stubborn struggle of ideologies. Consequently, war is a confrontation, a brutal struggle between opponents. That is, all means are good for victory, in other words, the end justifies the means.
Let's imagine that we ask this question to famous writers, one of the smartest and most educated representatives of society. Of course, they are no longer alive, but they speak to us through their books. F.M. Dostoevsky in his novel “Crime and Punishment” speaks of the fallacy of such statements. He shows the image of a man who believed that the end justifies the means. Rodion Raskolnikov claims that he has the right to kill, since great people stop at nothing to achieve their goals, and he without any doubt considers himself one of such great people. But having committed a crime, he retreats from his goal - he hides the stolen goods on the street without touching a penny. He almost hates his mother and sister, formerly dearly loved ones, for whose sake (as he believes) he even goes to the extent of murder. In fact, he barely wants to prove to himself that he is not “a trembling creature, but I have the right.” Why does he change so much after the murder? In my opinion, his psyche, his soul, was damaged. Rodion, crying in his sleep because a horse was killed in his presence, cold-bloodedly kills the old money-lender in order to achieve his goal; moreover, he kills her sister simply as a witness. By the end of the novel, Raskolnikov already understands the immorality of his goal and turns to God to atone for his sins.
The writer Vasil Bykov in the story "Sotnikov" says the same thing as Dostoevsky. Fisherman, main character, the story, passionately wants to survive. He uses any means for this, and does not stop at betrayal, or even at knocking the bench out from under the hanged Sotnikov. So what? After everything he has done, he wants to go back and fix everything, but there is no going back. Realizing that everyone had turned their backs on him, the Fisherman, who committed all the crimes for the sake of own life, wants to interrupt her - to hang himself.
Thus, the general thought of the writers can be expressed in the words of Ivan Karamazov: “No human happiness is worth one child’s tear.” That is, many writers considered the phrase: “In war, all means are good” to be incorrect.”
From my small life experience I know that people who use unworthy means often do not achieve their goal, or, having achieved it, are tormented by their conscience. For example, young women who persuade their loved one to destroy their family or betray them are unhappy in love. I find confirmation of my thoughts in literature. Katerina, “Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk,” in order to ensure complete and undisturbed happiness with her beloved, kills innocent people, but her lover leaves for another woman. Katerina from the drama A.N. Ostrovsky's "Thunderstorm" cheated on her husband for the sake of forbidden love, but abandoned by the cowardly Boris, she drowned herself. This series can be continued for a long time, but I will generalize: neither those who were betrayed nor those for whom they betrayed love traitors. The end does not justify the means.
Consequently, the expression “in war, all means are fair” is immoral, and it is used in an attempt to justify unseemly actions.
Updated: 2017-11-29
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
Introduction: What could be worse than war for humanity? Natural disasters and epidemics are, of course, terrible, but they do not depend on human will. War is a concentration of hatred and anger among the people, their destructive outburst. How much grief and tears it brings, how many human lives it takes, how many destinies it destroys!
The terrible thing is that innocent people, civilians and children are dying. Our people had to endure many wars, but the First World War, the Civil War and the Second World War were especially destructive and cruel. world war. Many writers, both Russian and foreign, have addressed this topic. They condemn the war, its foul breath, and talk about its destructiveness. But it also happens, like in a patriotic war - the enemy has come, you need to defend the Motherland. War is inevitable. Are all the remedies good? What is possible in war and what is not?
Arguments: Leo Tolstoy in the epic story “War and Peace” shows the illusory nature of military glory. Andrei Bolkonsky, having come into contact with the abomination of war, understands its inhumanity. As a person with high moral principles, he does not consider every means justified. Napoleon goes to glory, paving the road with the corpses of soldiers.
Tragic moment from civil war Mikhail Sholokhov pulls out. Ilya Bunchuk strives to defeat the bourgeoisie at any cost, believing that in war all means are good. His reprisals against opponents of the revolution were extremely cruel. But the price was too high for him - Ilya lost his mind. The highest value on earth - human life. The death of a person is equivalent to the death of the entire universe. You cannot take the lives of your own kind and go unpunished.
War awakens and reveals base human feelings; animal fear of death often becomes the cause of betrayal and betrayal. A striking example this is Alexey Shvabrin from Pushkin’s “The Captain’s Daughter”. The fear of death makes him a traitor, there is nothing left in him worthy of the title of a nobleman and a simple man.
The US carried out explosions unnecessarily nuclear bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to establish their positions. Many civilians, including children, died. There is no justification for such conduct of the war; nothing threatened the lives of the American people. This is simply a sadistic reprisal of the winner against the vanquished, the strong against the weak.
Great Patriotic War Soviet people With Nazi Germany left us terrible scars and scars in memory of how terrible the means of warfare can be. Mass extermination of the population, concentration camps, burned villages, kidnapped youth, robberies and violence - these are the means. Who will return the ruined lives of young people, will collect the shed tears of widows, mothers, orphans? Who has the power to do this? IN Soviet army reprisals against civilians and looting were prohibited, and there was high military discipline. For me personally, this is a sign of moral and moral superiority.
Conclusion: There are inevitable wars when our consent is not asked. Often our people had to fight liberation wars, and the main thing in war is to be able to remain human. Reprisals against civilians and especially cruel methods of warfare are unacceptable. Human life should be valued above all else.
End justifies the means
End justifies the means
From Latin: Finis sanctificat media (finis sanctificat media).
It is traditionally believed that these words belong to the famous Italian thinker, historian and statesman Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), author of the famous treatises “The Prince” and “Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livy.” But this is a mistake - there is no such expression in the creative heritage of this outstanding political scientist of the Middle Ages.
In fact, this saying belongs to the Jesuit Eekobar and is the motto of the Jesuit order and, accordingly, the basis of their morality (see: Velikovich L.N. The Black Guard of the Vatican. M., 1985).
Encyclopedic dictionary of popular words and expressions. - M.: “Locked-Press”. Vadim Serov. 2003.
End justifies the means
The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who wrote in the book “On the Citizen” (1642): “ Since one who is denied the right to use the necessary means is also useless the right to strive for the goal, it follows that since everyone has the right to self-preservation, then everyone has the right to use all means and perform any act without which he is not able to protect myself". Jesuit Father Herman Busenbaum in his essay "Fundamentals of Moral Theology" (1645) wrote: " To whom the goal is permitted, the means are also permitted.".
Dictionary of catch words. Plutex. 2004.
See what “The end justifies the means” is in other dictionaries:
- “The end justifies the means” catchphrase, originally by Niccolò Machiavelli Il fine giustifica i mezzi. This expression is found in a number of authors: The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588 1679) The German theologian Hermann ... Wikipedia
Adverb, number of synonyms: 3 the game is worth the candle (6) the game is worth the candle (6) ... Dictionary of synonyms
End justifies the means- wing. sl. The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who in the book “On the Citizen” (1642) wrote: “Since he who is denied the right to use the necessary ... ... Universal additional practical explanatory dictionary I. Mostitsky
end justifies the means- about justifying immoral ways of achieving goals. Tracing paper from Italian. Authorship is attributed to the writer and politician Italy N. Machiavelli. This idea was expressed by him in the essay “The Sovereign” (1532). Similar thoughts are found... ... Phraseology Guide
Razg. On the justification of immoral ways of achieving goals. BMS 1998, 612 ... Big dictionary Russian sayings
The problem expressed in the well-known maxim “The end justifies the means” and associated with the value aspect of the relationship between value and value and, accordingly, with the choice and evaluation of means in expedient activity. Regarding the solution to this problem in the popular... Philosophical Encyclopedia
A goal is an image of the desired future, an ideal result that political actors strive for, which is an incentive for activity. The goal in politics, in addition to motivational, also fulfills organizational, mobilization... ... Political science. Dictionary.
Wed. There are many means to get rid of it... The goal sanctifies the means... Our brotherhood allows us to resort to a dagger or poison in cases like this. Gr. A. Tolstoy. Don Juan. 1. Wed. Some Jesuits claim that every remedy is good, as long as... ... Michelson's Large Explanatory and Phraseological Dictionary
Adverb, number of synonyms: 3 the game is not worth the candle (11) inappropriate (14) ... Dictionary of synonyms
One of the elements of behavior and consciousness. human activity, which characterizes the anticipation in thinking of the result of an activity and the way of its implementation with the help of definitions. funds. C. acts as a way to integrate various actions... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia
Books
- The end justifies the means, Evgeniy Monk. The end justifies the means, says the leader of the criminal group Monk. And if so, then any methods are good. Including the dirtiest ones - murder, bribery, blackmail. The Monk has competitors...
War is, without a doubt, one of the most terrible trials that can befall a person. Nothing brings so much misfortune, so much sorrow and suffering as wars do. From small tribal skirmishes to the catastrophic conflicts of the twentieth century, they have haunted humanity throughout our history. In addition to the enormous risk to life, war is also the most difficult test of the human psyche. To remain a person at the front, when comrades are dying around you every day, or in the rear, when you constantly live in fear for your loved ones, afraid of receiving a fatal letter from the front - only a truly strong-willed person can withstand this. I believe that the consequentialist principle of “all is fair in war” is a fundamentally wrong way of looking at the world, especially in the context of actual warfare.
When discussing the war, it is difficult not to recall one of the greatest works of Russian and world literature - “War and Peace” by L.
Our experts can check your essay according to the Unified State Exam criteria
Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
N. Tolstoy. Tolstoy's ideas of non-violence made a huge contribution to Russian philosophy, and were also reflected in the characters of many of the heroes of this work. The highest manifestation moral qualities and philanthropy is an episode in which Natasha Rostova, a man with extremely rich inner world, in tears, persuades his parents to give all the carts that the Rostov family had at their disposal to the wounded soldiers, who otherwise would have faced inevitable death in French captivity. In this scene, the goal is to evacuate Moscow with as little cost as possible, but to achieve this goal the Rostovs would have to refuse to help the soldiers. This did not happen only thanks to Natasha, who was able to convince the whole family and manage the carts fairly.
We encounter another incredibly difficult episode for both the reader and the characters in the epic novel “ Quiet Don» Mikhail Sholokhov. Here the heroes face an even more difficult test - a civil, “fratricidal” war. Ilya Bunchuk is an example of a person who is ready to do anything for the sake of the party and “the fight against the bourgeois system.” He is engaged in agitation at the front, preparing militias in the rear, and making every effort to suppress the white movement. However, even he is unable to withstand the work of the commandant of the revolutionary tribunal. After a week of constant executions of White Guards, Bunchuk’s psyche was completely shaken. He suddenly realized how terrible sin accomplished, “bringing the revolution to the masses.” The death of his beloved finally breaks him: death for him becomes a happy occasion, a release from suffering.
Thus, using the example of two different works, we were convinced that, despite any circumstances, the most important thing is to maintain basic moral guidelines and not turn from a man into a beast. I would like to end with a quote from a philosophy textbook: “A person who violates fundamental moral principles undoubtedly acts against himself, since he destroys his psyche due to the constant conflict of consciousness and subconsciousness. He cannot avoid this conflict, even if he convinces himself that he does not care about high morality.”
Updated: 2017-09-25
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
