One of the basic forms of syntactic analysis is to parse a sentence into sentence members. This allows you to track the nature of the connections between different parts of the sentence, determine the specifics of intonation, and also find the phrases used in the sentence. Despite the fact that such analysis is taught from school, many people encounter a number of difficulties when performing such analysis and turn to the capabilities of the network for help. Below I will consider a scheme for such an analysis of the CL of a sentence, give the features of its key steps, and also tell you whether there are online resources that can help us in performing analyzes of this type.

It is important for the formation and training of people's spelling literacy, honing the necessary spelling skills.

This is especially important in today’s educational environment, when:

• falls average level independent reading;
• there is an insufficient number of manuals on spelling techniques;
• the general level decreases cognitive interest in students.

When regularly parsing a proposal by members, you perform several basic tasks at once:

1. Get acquainted directly with many syntactic structures in sentences;
2. Learn to express your thoughts both directly and metaphorically, sharpen your logical thinking;
3. Express your thoughts both orally and in writing;
4. Prevent the occurrence of various speech errors;
5. Learn to formulate questions correctly.

According to the existing methodology, syntactic parsing of a sentence is possible in three main forms:

• Formal form (members of the proposal are distinguished by questions);
• Semantic form (subject, object, predicate, etc. are distinguished);
• Communicative form (theme and rheme are highlighted, that is, given and new information).

In this case, sentences are usually analyzed in which their formal structure does not conflict with the communicative and semantic structure.

How to Parse a Sentence

Carrying out this analysis involves following a methodological template consisting of the following:

1. We determine whether the sentence is simple or complex (that is, how many grammatical bases it has - if there is one, then it is simple, if there are two or more, it is complex);
2. We identify the sentence by the purpose of its utterance (whether it is narrative, interrogative or motivating);
3. What is its intonation (exclamatory or non-exclamatory).

If this sentence is simple, then we define its further typology:

1. We establish whether our proposal is widespread or not widespread (that is, if it has only main members, then it is not widespread, and if in addition to the main members there are also secondary ones, then it is widespread);
2. We analyze it into the main (subject and predicate) and secondary members of the sentence (definition, addition, circumstance), identify which part of speech they are expressed by;
3. We identify homogeneous members of the sentence (if any), that is, are there members that answer the same question and are associated with the same word.

If this sentence is complex, then:

Features of parsing

When performing this type of analysis, you must remember that:

• Any grammatical concept is expressed by the unity of its grammatical features;
• One word cannot be different members of a sentence;
• The greatest difficulty is caused by the differentiation of the secondary members of the sentence being analyzed, which are expressed by a noun.

Online resources for breaking down member proposals

There are practically no network resources on the RuNet that allow you to parse sentences online. This is primarily due to the complexity of developing such tools. For example, the same word in a sentence can have different semantic meaning. At the same time, in the English-language segment there are a number of such services that allow you to analyze English-language sentences by members of the sentence online.

In particular, I would like to draw the reader’s attention to the following resources:

Let's now look at several proposals for CL in practice.

Example No. 1

“White, yellow and blue butterflies fluttered over the dandelions.”

This offer:

• simple;
• has a narrative character (tells us about something);
• widespread (has members other than the main one);
• non-exclamatory;
• complicated by homogeneous definitions.

In parts of speech it looks something like this:

Example No. 2

“The children were decorating the New Year tree, my wife was preparing a festive dinner, my mother was helping her.”

This is the proposal:

• complex (has three grammatical bases);
• has a narrative character;
• widespread;
• non-exclamatory.

The parts of speech look like this:

Example No. 3

"The holidays have arrived."

This is a simple declarative sentence; it is also non-exclamatory and non-exclamatory.

Conclusion

The online resources available on the network do not provide a full opportunity to analyze proposals for CL. Therefore, it is recommended to use the methodology given in the article and hone your own knowledge, skills and abilities in conducting a syntactic analysis of the sentences you need.

When working with various texts, many people need to parse a sentence according to its composition. Carrying out such analysis usually presupposes that a person has appropriate philological knowledge that can help in the correct analysis of the text he needs. At the same time, there are also services on the network that perform online sentence parsing operations. After thoroughly studying the rules for analyzing different composition proposals, I decided to present all my findings in this article.

Rules for parsing sentences

At the beginning, I note that the expression “parsing a sentence by composition” is somewhat incorrect, since words are usually parsed by composition, and what interests us in this case is called “syntactic parsing of a sentence.”

In this case, the specified syntactic parsing (at school it is also called “parsing by members”) is usually performed as follows:

• Decide which sentence you are analyzing based on the purpose of its statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating in nature);
• Indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (is it exclamatory or non-exclamatory);
• Note the number of grammatical stems in this sentence (if the sentence is simple, then one stem, if complex, then two or more);

If the sentence is simple:

Example of a simple sentence:

“It was an extraordinary autumn day!”

After spending parsing we can see that this sentence is declarative, exclamatory, simple, two-part, complete, uncomplicated.

If the sentence is complex:

• Decide on the connection in a complex sentence - union or non-union;
• Indicate the connection used in the sentence - intonation, subordinating, coordinating;
• Please indicate the type complex sentence- non-union, complex, complex.

Example of a complex sentence:

“The bouquet included roses and lilies, but she liked tulips better.”

Having carried out a syntactic analysis of this sentence, we can see that this sentence is of a narrative nature, not exclamatory, complex, has allied communications, compound. The first sentence here is two-part, the grammatical basis is the words “there were roses and lilies”, it is common, and is complicated by homogeneous subjects.

The second sentence in this complex sentence is two-part, its grammatical basis is the words “liked tulips”, the sentence is common and not complicated.

Services for analyzing proposals by composition online

Due to the richness of grammatical structures and the complexity of creating a powerful network tool for syntactic text analysis, the services presented on the network (of which there are few) have rather weak capabilities for conducting a full syntactic parsing of sentences. However, I would highlight the following resources:

Seosin.ru

Among the Russian-language resources for conducting semantic analysis online (de facto they are practically not represented), I would highlight the seosin.ru service. It allows you to identify syntactic and morphological errors, demonstrates the general associativity of the text, and performs other types of analysis. Unfortunately, the service does not always work stably; dysfunctions are often observed in its operation.

1. To work with this service, go to seosin.ru.
2. Enter your proposal in the appropriate window and click on “Analyze”.

Lexisrex.com

For lovers of the English language, the powerful linguistic resource lexisrex.com can help with parsing. Its capabilities make it possible to analyze a proposal by its members. However, this site also has other auxiliary tools for carrying out various types of linguistic analysis online.

1. To use this resource, log in to lexisrex.com.
2. Paste your proposal into the appropriate window and click on the “Analyze” button.

Linguist forums

When parsing sentences online, you can turn to the help of the “human factor” and go to various linguist forums (level gramota.turbotext.ru, rusforus.ru and analogues). Register there, ask your question, and they will definitely help you.

Conclusion

Network resources that allow you to analyze proposals by composition are rather scarce, which is associated with the difficulties of creating such resources. However, there are several such tools available on the Internet (most of them are in English) that make it easy to carry out the text analysis we need. Use the functionality of these services to analyze necessary proposals, and perform parsing online.

Parsing a sentence is the most frequently asked task from school, which some people fail to do. Today I will tell you how to outwit your teacher and do everything right.

Today I will give you the TOP 5 services that will help you analyze a sentence into parts of speech.

All of them can perform some kind of parsing of sentences or words. Each of them has some pros and cons.

These services will be specialized for both Russian and English languages.

And let me tell you, they don't work great per se, but they will help you get most of your job done.

Comparison

In the tables above, I have listed the best of the best services that can help you with your sentence parsing assignments.

If you have read the table, I propose to start analyzing each of the services and we will start from the very last line of our list and gradually reach the leader of our TOP.

Service name	Service language	Word/sentence	Link
GoldLit	Russian	Offer	http://goldlit.ru/component/slog
Gramota.ru	Russian	Word	http://gramota.ru/slovari/dic
Morphology online	Russian	Word	http://morphologyonline.ru
Delph-in	English	Offer	http://erg.delph-in.net/logon
Lexis Res	English	Offer	http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study/

№5 Lexis Res

Using this link you can get to this service and evaluate its work yourself: http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study.

What kind of site is this? For people who study English, this is just a treasure. This page allows you to analyze English text. It can be used by a person with any level of knowledge.

This is a service that allows you to parse a sentence completely in English language. Sentences can be simple, complex, compound or complex.

In addition to the fact that the site does this analysis of any type of sentence, it also explains each word by meaning. That is, if you do not know the exact meaning of a word, then this resource is perfect for you.

You just need to write the text you need in the field or click the “Random sentences” button, and then click the “Analyze” button, and then you will get detailed analysis each word in a sentence: explanation of the meaning of the word, part of speech.

What advantages does this site have over others? First of all, the service is very easy to use; you won’t need to spend a lot of time to understand what’s what.

Secondly, the site has a huge database that allows you to parse text of any complexity and topic.

In addition, the site has enormous functionality; it will be useful in many other ways for people who are studying English.

• easy to use website;
• There are practically no advertisements that would distract;
• simple site interface;
• huge functionality;
• very good parsing.

Negative:

• If you do not have a satisfactory level of knowledge of the English language, it will be a little difficult to read all the explanations on the site;
• words during parsing are not underlined by parts of speech lines;
• there is no adaptation of the site to the Russian language.

As you can see, the ratio of pros and cons allows us to call this site good, but not great, which is why it is in fifth place.

№4 Delph-in

In fourth place is a service called “Delph-in".

You can try it out using this link: http://erg.delph-in.net/logon. This site is a real monster for people who are learning English. This service allows you to have online access to LinGO English Resource Grammar (ERG).

The grammar development platform Linguistic Knowledge Builder is used here.

This interface allows you to enter a single sentence using the ERG system and visualize the results of the analysis in various forms.

I will say right away that the site is suitable for those who are quite experienced in the English language, but this site is simply magnificent and necessary for such people.

What advantages does this service have? First of all, this site has a better degree of analysis of the proposal according to the method that is used at the University of Oslo, and to be precise, the Language Technology Group.

The European sentence parsing system is used here. In addition to using this method, this site shows different ways to parse a sentence, which makes parsing more flexible and convenient.

Now we will look at both the pros and cons of this service.

Positive:

• Very flexible system syntactic parsing of sentences;
• you can write sentences for the most various topics;
• an unlimited number of characters can be used in a sentence.

Negative:

• the first of them is that the service is quite complex for people with low and intermediate levels of English to use;
• To understand how the service works and disassemble it in order to understand what’s what, you need to devote several hours to the site.

We have familiarized ourselves with the fourth position and now we will move on to the third place of our TOP.

№3 MorphologyOnline

This site is ideal for those who need to qualitatively parse a sentence step by step, word by word, so as not to make mistakes and correctly select each part of speech for each word in the sentence being analyzed.

The service is also useful because it has a very broad description of each searched word.

What advantages does of this service? Let's look at them.

The first thing is that it is very easy to use. Its interface does not have any distracting elements, which will allow you to fully concentrate on the written information.

In addition to the fact that the service indicates the part of speech of a word, it also describes a morphological analysis, which makes the analysis of the word deeper and more thorough.

This will help you never make a mistake in parsing your sentence. Also, if you want to familiarize yourself with the parts of speech in detail, you can find information on this site, which is very conveniently and clearly explained.

Now let’s look at the service from both sides and see both the pros and cons. Let's start with positive side.

Positive:

• very simple - even the youngest user can handle it;
• there are no annoying advertisements, which makes using the service comfortable;
• deep Scan;
• a huge amount of information for independent syntactic parsing of a sentence.

Negative:

• this service can only analyze one word at a time, which makes the whole process slow;
• this site is more focused on morphological analysis words, but he does syntactic analysis just as well;
• There are no other tools available, which makes the site narrow for use in different areas.

It is because of these pros and cons that the service takes only third place. Now it's time for second place.

No. 2 "Gramota.ru"

Why is this service in 4th place? This site allows you to analyze one word at a time across all Russian dictionaries, which not only indicate the part of speech, but also explain the meaning of the searched word, synonyms, antonyms, and various forms.

Here you can even find the correct stress for any Russian word.

In addition to this service for a complete analysis of the word, there is a lot of materials on learning the Russian language, for example: a wide variety of dictionaries, magazines, alphabet books, books, tutors, and various useful links.

Therefore, if you want to fully analyze a word or increase your level of knowledge of the Russian language, you can safely use this resource.

Let's take a closer look at the advantages of the site. First of all, it has a very nice interface, everything is clear, you don’t need to search for anything. Everything you need can be immediately seen on the monitor display. The site itself has no advertising.

The entire design of the site is made in simple colors, that is, your eyes will not get so tired from reading this site for a long time.

Absolutely anyone can use this service: from first class to the elderly.

Since I described all the possible advantages in great detail, you can now make a whole short list and also add negative sides to see the full picture.

Why did this service take first place in our TOP? First of all, the site can parse a sentence, regardless of the number of characters and words.

The analysis on the site is very convenient. The service was created specifically for parsing sentences.

This site has a number of advantages. As mentioned, the site can analyze entire sentences, and not just words.

Syntactic analysis is carried out very conveniently: first, the initial forms of the word are written, then the parts of speech, then comes the grammatical analysis, and then the declension by case.

Of all the TOP, this service has the most convenient and eye-pleasing interface.

In addition to these advantages, the site also has sections with various literature from different periods, various poetry, both Russian and foreign. The site has information about many poets, many conveniently written biographies. All this will also help you study various literature if you need it.

But despite all these advantages, the site also has some disadvantages. We will talk about them after we have identified all the advantages.

Positive:

• performs a complete analysis of the sentence, regardless of the topic, number of words and characters;
• minimal amount advertising, but even this does not interfere with using the site;
• very easy to learn;
• a lot of information on the literature;
• great interface and good colors.

Negative:

• absolute lack of materials on the Russian language;
• the site is geared more towards literature, but still has a tool for parsing sentences.

Bottom line

Let's sum it up. After analyzing the entire TOP, you can understand that if you need a site for parsing sentences in Russian, I recommend you use the “Goldlit” resource.

Simplicity of the site excellent analysis offers, many interesting materials– these are the key factors that influenced the site’s placement in our top.

It is the absolute leader in our TOP and the best online service for parsing sentences in Russian on Russian Internet networks.

This is a resource that will help you not only complete homework, but also familiarize yourself with various literature. Use the Goldlit service.

Instructions

At the first stage, you need to parse the sentence into members and underline them: the subject - with one line, the predicate - with two, - with a wavy line, the complement - with a dotted line, and the adverbial - with alternating dashes and dots. Sometimes it is also necessary to indicate the connections between the members of the proposal and ask questions to each of them.

If the sentence is simple, indicate the type of predicate: simple (PGS), compound verb (CGS) or compound nominal (CIS). If there are several, indicate the type of each of them. If, however, number each of its parts and draw up a diagram of this sentence, indicating the means of communication (and allied words). In addition, indicate the types of clauses (definitive, explanatory or adverbial clauses: clauses of time, place, cause, effect, condition, purpose, concession, comparison, manner of action, measure and degree or connecting) and the types of relations between them (sequential, parallel or homogeneous ).

Next, describe the sentence, indicating its type by purpose of the statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating), by intonation (exclamatory or non-exclamatory) and by the number of grammatical stems (simple or complex: compound, complex, non-conjunct). If the sentence is simple, continue the analysis, indicating the type by the number of main members (two-part or one-part: nominative, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal or impersonal), by the presence of minor members (widespread or non-extended), by the presence of missing main members (complete or incomplete), and also indicate how it is complicated (homogeneous members, separate members, introductory or plug-in structures, treatment or is not complicated by anything). If the sentence is complex, continue the analysis according to the same scheme, but for each of its parts separately.

Video on the topic

Related article

The difference between a simple and complex sentence is based on their structure: if a simple sentence contains one grammatical base, then a complex sentence contains two or more such bases. Therefore, the parsing of sentences, which a graduate or applicant must be able to perform, has its own characteristics depending on the type. How to implement it?

Instructions

Give general characteristics :
a) according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or motivating);
b) by emotional coloring (exclamation or not);
c) by the presence of grammar (simple or complex); If simple, add the following points:
d) by: two-part or one-part (impersonal, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, nominative);
e) complete or incomplete;
f) by the presence of secondary ones (common or non-common).

If the sentence is simple, tell us about its structure:
a) sort by members and determine which parts of speech they are expressed by;
b) indicate how the sentence is complicated (homogeneous members; comparative phrases; direct speech; separate definitions expressed participial phrase, and so on.).

Explain the structure of a complex sentence:
a) determine the type (union, non-union or with various types connections) and the number of parts that make up a complex sentence.
b) indicate in a non-union complex sentence the meaning of the relationships between the parts (sequence, simultaneity, opposition, etc.);
c) in a conjunctive complex sentence, highlight the conjunctions or allied words and characterize them, determine the type (complex or complex):
- in a compound sentence, determine the type of coordinating conjunctions and characterize the semantic relationships between the parts of the sentence (alternation, sequence, simultaneity, opposition);
- in a complex sentence, determine the main clause, the type of subordinate clause (expository, attributive, adverbial of place, time, etc.) and the method of subordination (parallel, sequential, homogeneous).

Draw up a sentence diagram and explain punctuation marks.

Video on the topic

Tip 3: How to Parse a Sentence

Syntactic parsing of a sentence is the basis practical work above the text. This type analysis from year to year causes a lot of difficulties for schoolchildren. Meanwhile, a significant part of the tasks in the Unified State Examination and the State Examination Academy are in one way or another related to syntactic analysis.

Now ask the question from the predicate to the other members of the sentence. “Finished what?” - performance. The member of the sentence that answers questions about indirect cases is an object. In this case, the noun “performance” acts as an object. Underline it with a dotted line and write its syntactic function above the word.

Similarly, parse the second simple sentence that is part of the complex one. Ask a question from the predicate “applauded how?” - amicably. Members of a sentence that answer the questions “how?”, “when?”, “in what way?”, “for what reason?” etc. are circumstances. The adverb “friendly” in this case is a circumstance. Underline it with a dotted line, alternating a dash with a dot.

Now proceed to characterize the sentence according to the purpose of the statement. Follow the punctuation mark. If a sentence ends with a period, then it will be declarative, as in this case.

Take a look at the analysis and count the number of grammatical stems. If there is one basis, the sentence is simple, if there are two or more, it is complex.

If there are several bases, determine the nature of the connection between them. Are they related to each other in meaning (complex) or does one depend on the other (complex).

Video on the topic

Tip 4: How to parse a sentence

While studying the “Syntax” section in Russian language lessons, schoolchildren learn not only to see the structure of phrases and sentences, but also to perform syntactic parsing of sentences. To do this, they must be able to determine the type of sentence, see its structure, etc.

Instructions

Determine what the sentence is based on the purpose of the statement. If it simply reports something, it will be narrative. But the sentence “Schoolchildren, learn the rules of spelling alternating vowels” contains a call to action. Therefore, it will be motivating for the purpose of the statement. If a question is expressed in a syntactic construction, the sentence is interrogative.

In the syntactic analysis, indicate what kind of intonation the statement is. Keep in mind that it can be either an exclamation or a non-exclamation. For example, in the sentence “What a wonderful day today!” admiration and delight are expressed. Therefore, it will be an exclamation point. In addition, it contains information. Therefore, note in the analysis that it is narrative.

Underline the grammatical basis of the sentence. Indicate whether the sentence is simple or complex. So, in the statement “The rain passed, and we went for a walk” there are two: “the rain passed”, “we went for a walk”. Therefore, this proposal is complex.

Specify the type of complex sentence. It can be complex or non-union. For example, in the statement “The students decided to go on a hike when the holidays begin,” there is a main clause “The students decided to go on a hike” and a subordinate clause “When the rains begin,” to which a question can be posed. They are connected by the subordinating conjunction “when”. This sentence is complex.

Determine the type of subordinate clause by asking a question about it. Thus, in the syntactic construction “When the sun comes out, we will go to the river,” the subordinate clause is located at the beginning of the statement, and you need to ask the question “when?” Therefore, it is an adverbial clause of time.

If you are performing a syntactic analysis of a complex sentence, then further characterize the parts of the statement separately, sequentially by the number of main members, the presence of secondary ones, etc. This is necessary, since one sentence in a complex sentence can be one-part, and another two-part.

Indicate in the analysis whether the sentence is one-part (there is only one main member) or two-part (there is both a subject and a predicate).

If the sentence is one-part, indicate its type. It can be definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal or nominal. For example, in the statement “I’ll catch the last train” there is only the predicate “I’ll have time.” It is expressed by a verb in the first person form, singular, present tense. This proposal is definitely personal.

Underline the minor members of the sentence, if any, and indicate whether the sentence is common or uncommon. In the statement “Students, help the elderly” there is a definition “elderly” and an addition “people”. Therefore, it is common.

Indicate which parts of speech express all the main and minor members.

If the statement contains complications in the form of homogeneous members, separate definitions or circumstances, etc., mark it.

Outline your proposal.

Video on the topic

Syntactic analysis can be carried out in relation to a phrase, a simple or complex sentence. In each case, its own analysis scheme is applied and characteristic components.

Instructions

During syntactic analysis, the main thing is highlighted and dependent word, and also finds out what speeches they relate to. Next, it is determined grammatical meaning phrases (and its attribute; action and the object to which it passes; action and its attribute; action and its cause, etc.). The method is set syntactic connection between words (coordination (the dependent word is in the same forms as the main word), adjacency (the dependent word is connected with the main word only in meaning) or control (the dependent word is placed with the main word in a certain case, i.e. when the form of the main word changes dependent form not )).

When parsing a simple sentence, the (subject and predicate) are highlighted. Then the type of sentence is determined by the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or incentive), its emotional coloring (exclamatory or non-exclamatory). After this, it is necessary to establish the type of sentence by its grammatical basis (one-part or two-part), by the presence of minor members (extensive or not extended), by the presence or absence of any member (complete or incomplete). Also, a simple sentence can be complicated (homogeneous or isolated members are present) or uncomplicated.

When parsing a complex sentence, in addition to determining the grammatical basis and type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement, it is necessary to prove that it is complex and establish the type of connection between simple sentences(union or non-union). If the connection is conjunction, then the type of sentence is determined by the nature of the conjunction: compound or complex. If the sentence is complex, then you need to find out how coordinating conjunction parts of a sentence are connected: connective, disjunctive or adversative. In a complex complex, the main thing is determined and subordinate clause, a means of connecting the subordinate clause with the main one, the question to which the subordinate clause answers, a type of complex sentence. If a complex sentence is non-union, then the semantic relationships between simple sentences are determined and the punctuation mark is explained. It is also necessary to draw an outline of the proposal.

Video on the topic

Syntactic analysis of a sentence is its characteristics according to various parameters. To perform this type of analysis, there is a simple algorithm that will help to correctly characterize the sentence.

Parsing a simple sentence

1. Determine the type of sentence based on the purpose of the statement. It can be narrative, interrogative or motivating.
Today we are going for a walk. - This is a declarative sentence.
Are we going for a walk today? - interrogative.
Go for a walk today. - motivating.

2. Determine the type of sentence by intonation: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.
What wonderful weather! - exclamation point.
The weather was beautiful. - non-exclamatory.

3. Determine the type of sentence based on the number of grammatical stems. If there is one basis, it is a simple sentence, and if there are two or more, it is a complex sentence.
My dog ​​loves bread. - this is a simple sentence, since grammatical basis- one (the dog loves).
My dog ​​loves bread, and my cat prefers sausage. - this is a complex sentence, since there are two grammatical bases here (the dog loves, the cat prefers).

4. Determine the type of sentence of the grammatical basis. If the grammatical basis consists of a subject and a predicate, then such a sentence is called two-part, and if it consists of only a subject or only a predicate, it is called one-part.
A warm summer evening has arrived. - two-part proposal;
It was getting dark outside. - a one-part proposal.
For one-part sentences, it is also necessary to determine their type. They can be:
definitely personal (the main member of the sentence is the predicate, expressed by a verb 1st or 2nd person). For example:
I love the sun (the predicate “love” is expressed by a 1st person verb, you can substitute the subject “I”).
Come into the house (the predicate “come” is expressed by a 2nd person verb, you can substitute the subject “you”).
indefinitely personal (the main member of the sentence is the predicate, expressed by a 3rd person plural verb). For example:
They didn’t answer me (the predicate “they didn’t answer” is expressed by a 3rd person plural verb, you can substitute the subject “they”).
impersonal (the main member of the sentence is the predicate, and the subject cannot be substituted even orally). For example:
It is getting dark (it is impossible to substitute any subject).
nominative (the main member of the sentence is only the subject). For example:
Night (the sentence has only a subject, no predicate).

5. Determine the type of sentence by the presence of secondary members. If they exist, this is a common offer; if not, it is not common.
The sun was shining (unspread)
This morning the sun is especially bright (widespread).

6. Determine whether the sentence is complicated, and if so, indicate why. Sentences can be complicated by homogeneous members, participles and participial phrases, introductory words,

Tasks related to syntactic analysis of text cause difficulties for schoolchildren and students of the philology department. A competently carried out syntactic analysis of a sentence requires quite extensive knowledge in the field of the Russian language. But, having basic concepts, you can successfully cope with the tasks.

What is sentence parsing

Parsing is the analysis of a sentence according to the following criteria:

1. Type according to the purpose of the statement.
2. Kind of emotional coloring.
3. The number of stems (hereinafter simple and complex sentences are parsed according to a certain order).
4. Characteristics of the members of the sentence.
5. Constructions that complicate the sentence (if any).
6. Punctuation analysis.
7. Scheme (if required).

Sentence parsing free online

Finding a program that can correctly perform parsing in full, taking into account all the nuances, is quite difficult. But still there are several services on the network that will help solve the problem.

The Seosin.ru resource is the most popular available. When you enter a sentence in the appropriate window, you can get a syntactic analysis of the text.

If semantic analysis is required for analysis, it is best to use the program of the well-known exchange “Advego”.

Get online solution It is also possible from specialists - philologists and linguists. To do this, you need to go to the appropriate forum (http://gramota.ru/, https://lingvoforum.net/, http://lingvo.zone/). Professionals will definitely help with analysis and give a comprehensive answer to the most difficult question.

Do the parsing yourself

You can comprehend all the intricacies of analysis if you carefully read the information below and practice a little.

I. Purpose of the utterance

Depending on the purpose, proposals are divided into:

1. narrative(they convey information, report something, affirm or deny. At the end of such sentences there is a period or an exclamation mark);
2. interrogative(contain a question, at the end there is (required!) a question mark);
3. incentive(contain an incentive, appeal, request, demand). Characteristic are incentive intonation, the use of imperative verbs, particles let, let, come on.

II. Emotional coloring

The indicator is the presence exclamation point. There he is - a proposal exclamation point, No - non-exclamatory. Any of the sentences according to the purpose of the statement can become exclamatory.

III. Number of grammar points

Based on the availability of basics, proposals are simple and complex. Simple ones include those in which there is 1 grammatical stem.

Accordingly, a complex sentence must have 2 or more stems.

III. 1. The procedure for parsing a simple sentence

The type of proposal based on the presence of main members should be indicated.

The main members include subjects and predicates.

Subject answers the questions who and what? Can be expressed by almost any part of speech.

Predicate answers the questions what does it do, what is this object, who is it, what is it like, what state is it in? It can also be expressed by different parts of speech.

Minor members include addition(answers questions about indirect cases), definition(which? whose?) and circumstance(where? when? where? how much? etc.)

III. 1.1 Common and non-common offers

If a sentence contains only main members, it uncirculated. If the sentence has at least one minor member - common.

III. 1.2. One-piece or two-piece

If a sentence has a subject and a predicate, the sentence is two-part. If only one main member is one-piece.

III. 2. Analysis of a complex sentence.

After determining the type of simple or complex sentence, it is necessary to analyze the secondary members, find complicating structures and explain the placement of punctuation marks.

Parsing examples

Syntactic analysis of the sentence: The sun was already quite high in the clear sky.

• 1 base - simple,
• The basis is the sun (subject) stood (predicate). Secondary members of the sentence: stood (where?) in the sky (adverbial). In the sky (what?) pure (definition). It was (how?) already quite high (circumstance).

Syntactic analysis of the sentence: The rain fell along the garden path.

• Narrative, non-exclamatory,
• 1 base - simple,
• there are both main terms - two-part,
• there are minor ones - common.
• The bottom line is that the rain has passed.
• Secondary members: walked (where or how?) along the path (circumstance). Garden path (what?) (definition).
• There are no complicating structures or punctuation marks.

Syntactical analysis of the sentence: Blueness appeared between the thinning tops.

• Narrative, non-exclamatory,
• 1 base - simple,
• there are both main terms - two-part,
• there are minor ones - common.
• The base appeared blue.
• Secondary members: appeared (where?) between the tops (circumstance), (which ones?) blue (definition).
• There are no complicating structures or punctuation marks.

Syntactical analysis of the sentence: Old handwritten books were worth their weight in gold.

• Narrative, non-exclamatory,
• 1 base - simple,
• there are both main terms - two-part,
• there are minor ones - common.
• The basis is that books were valued.
• Secondary members: were valued (how?) as worth their weight in gold (circumstance). Books (what?) old handwritten (definition).
• There are no complicating structures or punctuation marks.

Syntactical analysis of the sentence: The summer was dry, there was almost no rain.

• Narrative, non-exclamatory,
• 2 basics (the summer was dry and there was no rain), so we analyze a complex sentence,
• Part 1 – undistributed,
• Part 2 – common. The secondary member is a circumstance (how?) almost.
• Non-Union.
• The parts are separated by a comma.